{"id":1330,"date":"2016-11-14T21:23:22","date_gmt":"2016-11-14T21:23:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/standingrockclassaction.org\/?page_id=1330"},"modified":"2017-09-03T23:42:31","modified_gmt":"2017-09-03T23:42:31","slug":"the-u-s-constitution-the-real-story","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/standingrockclassaction.org\/?page_id=1330","title":{"rendered":"The American Revolution, The U.S. Constitution, and “The Treaty Clause”"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

The page is continued from the<\/span> First Contact w\/ Europeans<\/a> section.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

    Below <\/em><\/strong>constitutes a rough draft version of this particular history section.  The heavily-upgraded <\/strong>textbook <\/em><\/strong>version will be available soon.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Pt. 1:<\/span>  <\/i>The Fascist<\/span> <\/i>Ancient Criminal<\/span> Law System, & The Desperate Attempt <\/i>At Creating A New Civil<\/span><\/em> Government<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

                      The American Revolution;                     A Desperate Attempt at Escape from Slavery<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

    All sections of<\/span> <\/span><\/span>The Constitution of The United States<\/a><\/span> which mention “Indians” or “Treaties”, as well as <\/span>other key sections-<\/span> <\/em>are presented & then analyzed, translated <\/em><\/span>below, & then brought into historical context <\/span>below<\/span><\/em>.  Sections <\/span>directly related to the analysis<\/span> <\/em><\/span>will be found<\/span> <\/span><\/span><\/span>highlighted<\/span> in red<\/span>.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/em>  <\/span>Its recommended that if anything appears too complex at first, to simply <\/span>skip that section <\/span><\/em>& continue reading, as things should<\/span> become easier to grasp as you move<\/span> forward.<\/span>  Though<\/span><\/em>  <\/span><\/span>The Constitution<\/a><\/span> has been <\/span><\/span><\/span>violated<\/span> <\/em>on <\/span>many<\/em><\/span> occasions historically, it was <\/span>created<\/span> <\/em>with great <\/span>knowledge <\/span>of<\/span> history, & with wisdom in creating a political tool to aid our current generation in what the Founding Fathers foresaw would likely befall us, & in many ways has.  <\/span><\/em>Despite popular belief, the document was not built to <\/span>encourage <\/span><\/em>or<\/span><\/em><\/span> condone slavery; rather, it was designed to <\/span><\/em>free<\/span><\/em><\/span> people <\/span><\/em>from<\/span><\/em><\/span> slavery amongst a world where slavery has been rampant<\/span> throughout <\/span><\/em>many<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/strong> civilizations<\/span><\/strong> for <\/i>far<\/span> <\/i>too<\/span> long<\/span>.<\/i>..<\/strong><\/span>  <\/strong><\/span><\/em><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

For example,<\/strong><\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

The Removed Section<\/em> of The Declaration of Independence:<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

    “<\/span>He <\/span><\/span><\/strong>(King George III<\/a>)<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/em> has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery<\/em> in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither<\/a>.  This piratical <\/span><\/span><\/strong>(pirate)<\/span><\/em> warfare, the <\/span><\/span>opprobrium<\/a> <\/strong>(<\/span>disgrace, especially of large numbers of persons<\/span><\/span>)<\/span> <\/span><\/span><\/em>of infidel powers, is the warfare of the Christian King of Great Britain.  Determined to keep open a market where Men should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or restrain this execrable commerce.  And that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact<\/em> of distinguished die<\/em>, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, by murdering the people on whom he has obtruded<\/a> them: thus paying off former crimes committed again the Liberties of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another.<\/span><\/span>“<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\""The<\/a>
“The Trans Atlantic Slave”: http:\/\/macquirelatory.com\/Trans%20Atlantic%20Slave%20Trade.htm<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    When Thomas Jefferson included a passage attacking slavery in his draft of the Declaration of Independence<\/a> it initiated the most intense debate among the delegates gathered at Philadelphia<\/a> in the spring and early  summer of 1776.  Jefferson’s passage on slavery was the most important section removed from the final document- replaced with a more ambiguous passage<\/em> about King George<\/a>‘s incitement of “domestic insurrections<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/strong> <\/em><\/span><\/span><\/span>among us.<\/span>”  Decades later Jefferson blamed the removal of the passage on delegates from South Carolina<\/a> and Georgia<\/a> and Northern delegates who represented merchants who were at the time actively involved in the Trans-Atlantic slave trade<\/a>.<\/span>[1]<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

    But, the escaping colonists were up against <\/span>much more than stopping the slave trade, & those who were in-the-know needed to pull together as quickly as possible to create a political platform which could withstand the political body they were up against- which is explained in greater detail below.  To know why<\/span><\/span> The Constitution<\/a> was written in the way it was, one must also learn ‘what they were up against”, which goes far<\/span> beyond<\/span> “Great Britain<\/a>, The Stamp Act<\/a>, or ‘No Taxation Without Representation<\/a>“.  <\/span><\/em>What is written below is designed to equip <\/em>people with knowledge so “our path forward<\/a>” may be done with wisdom & insight- that we might not make the same mistakes.<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/span>..<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\"QUOTE<\/a>
QUOTE SOURCE: \u201cFounders Online, National Archive\u201d: From Thomas Jefferson to Uriah Forrest, with Enclosure, 31 December 1787: http:\/\/founders.archives.gov\/documents\/Jefferson\/01-12-02-0490 GRAPHIC SOURCE: http:\/\/www.relatably.com\/q\/quotes-by-thomas-jefferson-on-education-and-democracy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    The Constitution of the United States<\/a> mentions three areas of jurisdiction in which the courts & public officials may operate: Common Law, Equity Law, & Admiralty (or maritime)<\/span> Law<\/span>.  <\/span><\/em>All 3 <\/span><\/em>are mentioned within:<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

           <\/i>         Article III, Section 2,                              “The Case or Controversy Clause”       <\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

    \u201c<\/span>The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in<\/span> Law & Equity<\/span>, <\/span>arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, & Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority<\/i><\/span>;<\/i><\/span>\u2014to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers & Consuls;\u2014to all Cases of admiralty & maritime Jurisdiction<\/span>;\u2014 <\/span>to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party<\/span>;\u2014to Controversies between two or more States;\u2014 between a State & Citizens of another State,\u2014 between Citizens of different States,\u2014between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, & between a State, or the Citizens thereof, & foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

    The Trial of all Crimes<\/span>, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury<\/span>; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed<\/span>; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.\u201d<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"trialbyjury-jefferson-quote\"<\/a>
Quote from Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Paine, 1789, preserved in \u201cThe Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Memorial Edition (Lipscomb and Bergh, editors) 20 Vols., Washington, D.C., 1903-04. Graphic Source: http:\/\/quotesgram.com\/quotes-about-trial-by-jury\/<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

   Within the first line,<\/span> “The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in<\/span> Law & Equity”, two “areas of jurisdiction” are mentioned: <\/span>“Law” & “Equity”.  “Law” refers to “Common Law”, or “the law of the land” (explained below)<\/span>, whereas “Equity Law” is the mode of operation which governs contracts- including<\/span> contract breaches or<\/span> rescissions of contracts<\/a>, when necessary. <\/span><\/em> The other <\/em><\/span>jurisdiction<\/em> described in “The Case or Controversy Clause<\/a>” reads as follows: “to all Cases of admiralty & maritime Jurisdiction…“- which brings us to the third <\/em>“area of jurisdiction”:<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Maritime<\/em> Jurisdiction<\/span><\/span><\/h4>\n

    Maritime<\/em> is an area of jurisdiction<\/em> which governs commerce <\/em><\/span><\/strong>(trade between nations)<\/span><\/em><\/span>; it is also called “The Law of The Sea”.  “Admiralty”<\/em> is also <\/em>mentioned in the<\/span><\/strong><\/span> Case or Controversy Clause<\/a>; admiralty<\/span><\/strong><\/span> follows the same<\/em> rules & precepts <\/em>as Maritime, except that it is applied to commercial trade <\/em><\/span><\/strong>(trade of surplus between states, tribes, nations, or other types of political bodies<\/a>)<\/span><\/em><\/span> when done on land<\/em> rather than over bodies of water <\/em><\/span><\/strong>(at which time, it is called “maritime” rather than “admiralty”)<\/span><\/em><\/span>. <\/em> Both Admiralty and<\/em><\/span> Maritime are systems based<\/em> on commercial trade<\/a>;  this system-<\/em> often at odds with “the law of the land” <\/em><\/span><\/strong>(called “Common Law”)<\/span><\/em><\/span>,<\/em> can be very <\/em>confusing and<\/em> even dangerous <\/em>to persons who are unaware as to the differences between them.  <\/em>It is likely today<\/em> that through <\/span>denial of knowledge to<\/span> some<\/span> <\/em><\/span><\/strong>(many)<\/span><\/em><\/span> people through our schooling systems, <\/em>that our executive branch has<\/span> for<\/em> far too long <\/em>not<\/em><\/span> <\/em>been kept in <\/span><\/span>check<\/span>; <\/span>it will be by “learning the rules that <\/span><\/span>they<\/span> are playing by, & then using those same rules in order to hold them accountable to <\/span><\/span>what<\/span> the<\/span> law<\/span> actually<\/span> is<\/span><\/span>“<\/span> that will get The People back in power <\/span><\/span>over<\/span> a system that has been <\/span><\/span>subverted<\/a> by racist, classist, religiously-segregating criminal rings who have made things <\/span><\/span>appear<\/a><\/span> irreparably<\/span> <\/span>corrupt<\/span>.<\/span><\/span><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Abraham<\/a>
Abraham Lincoln Papers at the Library of Congress, From “Abraham Lincoln, [September 16-17, 1859] (Notes for Speech in Kansas and Ohio): https:\/\/www.loc.gov\/teachers\/classroommaterials\/connections\/abraham-lincoln-papers\/history3.html<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Need-to-Know: What Is<\/em><\/span> “Pro Se Civil Litigation”?<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

    “Pro Se Civil Litigation” is a way of representing one’s own case <\/em>in court without an attorney or lawyer.  <\/em>Whereas many people <\/em>cannot afford a lawyer or <\/em>attorney, “representing one’s self” can be an effective way to represent one’s case.  Every local Federal District <\/em>Courthouse website <\/em>has “Pro Se Civil Litigation Handbook” (under a similar name), <\/em>such as this one <\/em>from North Dakota’s <\/a>Northern District<\/a>:<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Pro Se Civil Litigation Handbook<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

Definition of PRO SE<\/a>, Black’s Law Dictionary:<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

“For himself; in his own behalf; in person.”[2]<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

LITIGATION<\/a>, Black’s Law Dictionary:<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

“A judicial controversy<\/a>. A contest in a court of justice, for the purpose of enforcing a right.”[3]<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Note:<\/span>  Many persons know their rights, <\/em>but still today (11-23-2016) too many persons <\/em>do not know how to enforce the protection of their rights <\/em>through the Federal Judiciary<\/a>.  To begin <\/em>to peel back the layers, <\/em>here is an article from the U.S. Embassy<\/a> website regarding the <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

History and Organization of the Federal Judicial System<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

FAQ:<\/span>  Why would government <\/span>officials<\/span> hold <\/span>themselves <\/em>accountable?  That doesn’t make sense?  If police officers & sheriffs are violating us- they’re not going to arrest <\/span>themselves<\/span>!<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

    First off, <\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/span>the<\/span> County of Morton<\/a> is <\/span><\/span><\/strong>a CORPORATION<\/a> , as evidenced on the <\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/span>Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corps. <\/em>in at least<\/em> two places:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

County of Morton<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

County of Morton II<\/em><\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

    The County of Morton was originally created in 1873<\/span><\/strong> (8 years after Abraham Lincoln was assassinated on April 14, 1865)<\/span><\/span><\/em> and later organized in 1878.[4]  The county was created by the 1872-1873 territorial legislature and named for<\/span> Oliver Hazard Perry Throck Morton<\/a> (1823-1877)<\/span>, governor of<\/span> Indiana<\/a> during the<\/span> American Civil War<\/a> and later a<\/span> United States Senator<\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

FAQ:<\/span>  How does “being a CORPORATION make the County of Morton (or certain other Counties) operate differently <\/em>than other types of political bodies?<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

     According to 1919 Supreme Court ruling Dodge v. Ford<\/span> (270 Fed. Appx. 200<\/a>), “<\/span>The purpose of a corporation is to make a profit for the shareholders, but a court will not interfere with decisions that come under the business judgment of directors.<\/span>“<\/span>[5]<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

According to Black’s Law Dictionary,<\/em> County of Morton (& all corporations)<\/em><\/span> <\/span>is considered an<\/span> ARTIFICIAL PERSON<\/a>:<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

“A nonhuman entity that is created by law and is legally different owning its own rights and duties. AKA jusistic person and legal person.  Refer to<\/span> body corporate<\/a>.<\/span>“<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

BODY CORPORATE<\/a> is defined as:<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

“A<\/span> corporation<\/a>.<\/span>“<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

CORPORATION<\/a> is defined as:<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

“An <\/span>artificial person<\/a> or <\/span>legal entity<\/a> created by or under the authority of the laws of a state or nation, composed, in some rare instances, of a single person and his successors, being the incumbents of a particular oltice, but ordinarily consisting of an<\/span> association<\/a> of numerous individuals, who subsist as a<\/span> body politic<\/a> under a special<\/span> denomination<\/a>, which is regarded In law as having a<\/span> personality<\/a> and existence distinct from that of its several members, and which is, by the same authority, vested with the capacity of continuous succession, irrespective of changes in its membership, either<\/span> in perpetuity<\/a> or for a limited term of years, and of acting as a unit or single<\/span> individual<\/a> in matters relating to the common purpose of the association, within the scope of the powers and<\/span> authorities<\/a> conferred upon such bodies by law.<\/span>  See Case of Sutton’s Hospital, 10 Coke. 32; Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518, 636, 657. 4 L. Ed. 629; U. S. v. Trinidad Coal Co., 137 U. S. 160, 11 Sup. Ct. 57. 34 L. Ed. 640; Andrews Bros. Co. v. Youngstown Coke Co., 86 Fed. 585, 30 C. C. A. 293; Porter v. Railroad Co., 76 111. 573; State v. Payne, 129 Mo. 468, 31 S. W. 797. 33 L. R. A. 576; Farmers’ L. & T. Co. v. New York, 7 Hill (N. Y.) 2S3; State BL.LAW DICT.(2D ED.)<\/em><\/span>“<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

WHEREAS a human being <\/em>is considered a<\/span> NATURAL PERSON<\/a>:<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

“A human being, naturally born, versus a legally generated<\/span> juridical person<\/a>.<\/span>“<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

JURIDICAL PERSON<\/a>:<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

“Entity, as a firm, that is not a single<\/span> natural person<\/a>, as a human being, authorized by law with duties and rights, recognized as a legal authority having a distinct identity, a<\/span> legal personality<\/a>.  Also known as<\/span> artificial person<\/a>, juridical entity, juristic person, or legal person.  Also refer to<\/span> body corporate<\/a>.<\/span>“<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Admiralty Law, A History & Introduction:<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

    Admiralty\/Maritime law utilizes a “separate language” made from common everyday words which don’t always translate<\/span> into the words you’re intending<\/span> to state: t<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/span>his video provides an excellent<\/span> introduction of the “separate language of maritime law”- often dubbed “legalese” for short:<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n